One thing with sitting at cafes and write is that there’s a lot of babies and their moms on maternity leave at cafes. The other day I couldn’t help but to overhear two mothers. They were anti-vaccine. That’s old news, you already know what that’s about. The new thing I heard them say was that they disliked the standard vitamin D supplement given to babies. They gave the babies other supplements.
Of course they can’t trust midwives and doctors. What does “Big science” know about vitamins? The only one you can trust is some hippy who sells supplements online. All those babies given standard vitamin D supplement will get rakitis. Or maybe they didn’t know what they were talking about.
Of course they can’t trust midwives and doctors. What does “Big science” know about vitamins? The only one you can trust is some hippy who sells supplements online. All those babies given standard vitamin D supplement will get rakitis. Or maybe they didn’t know what they were talking about.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm less concerned about things done to improve crop hardiness than I am to adding things like Round-Up to seeds.
no subject
Honestly though, the bulk (or at least loudest portions) of the anti-GMO movement is full of people who know about as much science as the anti-vax people.
I think things adjacent to GMOs, or related to their implementation, like companies being able to patent seeds/living things????, the potential for ecosystem fuckery by way of "oop this plant spread outside its niche and destroyed a vital link in the food chain," and our reliance on crop monoculture, should be evaluated and really seriously considered for their effect on the environment and our food production. But the process of modifying organisms has been demonstrated to be safe, so that really needs to stop being a talking point.
Do you mean the so-called "round-up ready" seeds? Or something else?
no subject
I think it could be the round-up ready seeds, yes. IIRC hey do something to the structure to make them more receptive to the glysophates?
I generally trust corporations about as far as I can throw them so even though the effects of round up are still in debate, I pretty much assume that "research" on either side has the outcome it was paid to have. And like you I worry about unintended consequences of the way we produce food.
no subject
Allowing corporations to operate for maximum profit instead of minimum harm is dangerous no matter what the industry. I'm 100% with you on that.
no subject
no subject
EDIT: And hold up, isn't vitamin D supposed to prevent rickets?
???
no subject
no subject
'Cause propper biology classes kill this nonsense off by teaching each and everyone as a teen how their body works, evidenced by science.
Even if you don't remember everything of it as an adult, but at least you've got a vague imagine in your brain to compare to what all the ratcatchers and hocus pocus gurus tell you as nonsense to make a quick buck.